Woodall Industries Inc. v. Tracy
Digest No. 7.38
Cite as: Woodall Industries Inc. v. Tracy, unpublished opinion of the Oakland County Circuit Court, issued Sept. 17, 1941 (Docket No. 26150).
Appeal pending: No
Claimant: Marie Tracy
Employer: Woodall Industries, Inc.
Date of decision: September 17, 1941
HOLDING: The requirement that a claimant be “able to work and available for work” includes the ability to procure transportation to the workplace.
FACTS: Claimant lived twenty-two miles from her place of employment. Claimant quit voluntarily because she lost access to transportation to the place of employment. The Claimant re-acquired transportation approximately four months later. Claimant was denied benefits for the period of time when she was without transportation.
DECISION: As a matter of fact and law, claimant was not “able to work and available to work” during the period when she had no means of transportation. Claimant was eligible for benefits from the time when she re-acquired transportation that allowed her to travel to her place of employment.
RATIONALE: Eligibility for benefits depends on the ability to travel to the place of employment.*
Digest Author: James Mestichelli, Michigan Law, Class of 2017
Digest Updated: 3/27/2016
*The court used 421.28(c), but that language seems to have been amended. That is why the statutory section cited above is just 421.28.